Consolidated Edison (ED), Emera (EMA), and Fortis (FTS) represent established players in the regulated utilities sector. Investors and traders seeking defensive equity exposure often compare these names due to their predictable revenue streams, dividend yields, and resilience during economic uncertainty. This analysis examines their recent stock behavior, operational footprints, and relative positioning in the current market environment, providing context for those evaluating income-oriented or sector-specific allocations.
Consolidated Edison (ED) operates as a regulated electric and gas utility primarily serving the New York metropolitan area. Its core activities include electricity generation, transmission, and distribution under rate-regulated frameworks. In recent market activity, the stock has traded in a range influenced by broader utilities sector dynamics and interest rate expectations. Year-to-date performance has outpaced the S&P 500 modestly, reflecting steady investor interest in defensive names. Recent weeks highlighted typical volume patterns without major single-event drivers, with sentiment supported by reaffirmed earnings guidance and ongoing infrastructure spending.
Emera (EMA) is a geographically diverse energy and services company focused on electricity generation, transmission, and distribution, with operations in Canada, the United States, and the Caribbean. The business model emphasizes regulated assets that provide stable returns. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited measured movements consistent with peer utilities, maintaining focus on dividend sustainability. Broader timeframe references show resilience amid currency and regulatory considerations typical for Canadian-listed issuers with U.S. exposure. Sentiment in recent weeks remained balanced, with attention on operational execution rather than outsized volatility.
Fortis (FTS) functions as an electric and gas utility holding company with regulated operations spanning Canada, the United States, and the Caribbean. Its portfolio includes transmission, distribution, and generation assets under stable regulatory regimes. Recent market activity positioned the stock with incremental price changes aligned with sector trends. Performance in recent weeks reflected ongoing earnings visibility, including quarterly result releases that reinforced baseline expectations. Sentiment stayed constructive on the back of predictable cash flows and capital investment programs typical for the industry.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing conditions appear in the trending section. Available bots display ranges of historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that allow users to evaluate fit. All maintain distinct styles and ticker sets. Review the curated options on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
ED, EMA, and FTS share regulated utility business models but differ in geographic concentration and scale. ED maintains a concentrated U.S. Northeast footprint with significant New York exposure, while EMA and FTS offer broader North American and Caribbean diversification. Recent momentum has been comparable across the group, driven more by macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate sensitivity than by unique catalysts. Risk factors include regulatory rate-case outcomes and capital expenditure requirements, with ED potentially facing higher urban infrastructure costs. Valuation sensitivity remains elevated for the sector overall, as bond-yield movements influence relative attractiveness. Market sentiment favors the stability these names provide, though trade-offs exist between ED’s domestic focus and the cross-border elements of EMA and FTS.
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning within the utilities sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to ED for its recent outperformance versus benchmarks and concentrated regulatory stability. EMA and FTS remain closely competitive given their diversified operations and dividend continuity. This assessment reflects current data patterns rather than forward projections.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and FTS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and FTS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while EMA (@Electric Utilities) price change was -5.70% , and FTS (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -1.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.
ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ED | EMA | FTS | |
| Capitalization | 39.9B | 15.5B | 28.5B |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 3.51B | 5.96B |
| Gain YTD | 11.483 | 4.773 | 7.663 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.76 | 22.60 | 23.12 |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 8.91B | 12.4B |
| Total Cash | 147M | 2.46B | 384M |
| Total Debt | 27.2B | 24B | 36.3B |
ED | EMA | FTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 61 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 32 Undervalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 84 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 79 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 56 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 51 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMA's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (48) in the null industry, and is in the same range as ED (60) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (61) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EMA (84) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s and significantly faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's SMR Rating (76) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (79) in the null industry, and is in the same range as EMA (79) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (54) in the null industry, and is in the same range as EMA (56) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (51) in the null industry, and is in the same range as ED (60) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to EMA’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| ED | EMA | FTS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 35% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | 16 days ago 51% | 16 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 39% | 6 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 36% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.