ED
Price
$106.35
Change
-$1.96 (-1.81%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
39.33B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EMA
Price
$50.08
Change
-$1.70 (-3.28%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTS
Price
$54.90
Change
-$1.34 (-2.38%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
28.02B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED or EMA or FTS

ED vs EMA vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ED: $106.35EMA: $50.08FTS: $54.90)
Brand notoriety: ED, EMA and FTS are all not notable
The three companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 107%, EMA: 96%, FTS: 116%
Market capitalization -- ED: $39.33B, EMA: $15.38B, FTS: $28.02B
$ED is valued at $39.33B, while EMA has a market capitalization of $15.38B, and FTS's market capitalization is $28.02B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electric Utilities ranges from $174.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electric Utilities industry is $30B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEMA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and FTS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the long-term than FTS, which in turn is a better option than EMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and FTS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • EMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the short-term than FTS, which in turn is a better option than ED.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while EMA (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.78% , and FTS (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-2.58% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($39.3B) has a higher market cap than FTS($28B) and EMA($15.4B). FTS and EMA has higher P/E ratio than ED: FTS (22.30) and EMA (21.96) vs ED (17.49). ED YTD gains are higher at: 9.714 vs. FTS (5.699) and EMA (1.706). ED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.48B vs. FTS (5.96B) and EMA (3.51B). EMA has less debt than ED and FTS: EMA (24B) vs ED (27.2B) and FTS (36.3B). ED has higher revenues than FTS and EMA: ED (17.7B) vs FTS (12.4B) and EMA (8.91B).
EDEMAFTS
Capitalization39.3B15.4B28B
EBITDA6.48B3.51B5.96B
Gain YTD9.7141.7065.699
P/E Ratio17.4921.9622.30
Revenue17.7B8.91B12.4B
Total CashN/A2.46B384M
Total Debt27.2B24B36.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs EMA vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
ED
EMA
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
295510
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
188563
SMR RATING
1..100
977677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
586159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
535137
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
504755

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ED's Valuation (27) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EMA (28) in the null industry, and is in the same range as FTS (53) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to EMA’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (63) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EMA (85) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s and significantly faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (77) in the null industry, and is in the same range as ED (97) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (59) in the null industry, and is in the same range as EMA (61) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (51) in the null industry, and is in the same range as ED (53) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to EMA’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDEMAFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTR119.256.86
+6.10%
Strategy Inc
CELC93.532.96
+3.27%
Celcuity
GFR6.450.08
+1.26%
Greenfire Resources Ltd
FNWD43.500.14
+0.32%
Finward Bancorp
NTZ1.15-0.06
-4.96%
Natuzzi SpA

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
-1.81%
DUK - ED
83%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
CMS - ED
78%
Closely correlated
-2.23%
WEC - ED
77%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
AEE - ED
76%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
PNW - ED
75%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
More

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
-3.28%
FTS - EMA
75%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
ED - EMA
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
DUK - EMA
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
AEE - EMA
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
SO - EMA
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with EMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then EMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
-2.38%
EMA - FTS
76%
Closely correlated
-3.28%
ED - FTS
74%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
DUK - FTS
73%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
AEE - FTS
73%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
PNW - FTS
71%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
More