Advertisement
EVR or MS or NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Evercore (EVR) vs. Morgan Stanley (MS) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Three distinct financial models: EVR is an independent advisory-led investment bank, MS is a diversified global bank with a large wealth franchise, and NDAQ is an exchange and financial-technology platform.
- Momentum diverges: Morgan Stanley recently reached an all-time high on record results, while Evercore and Nasdaq posted strong quarters but saw more muted stock reactions.
- Revenue drivers differ sharply: EVR leans on advisory fees, MS on wealth management and trading, and NDAQ on recurring software, data, and index revenue.
- Stability profile: NDAQ's recurring revenue is structurally steadier, whereas EVR's results are more cyclical and deal-flow dependent.
- Relative performance: MS has led year-to-date, followed by EVR and NDAQ, reflecting different growth and valuation sensitivity profiles.
Introduction
Investors evaluating the financial sector often face a choice between pure-play advisory firms, diversified banking giants, and market-infrastructure operators. This stock comparison puts EVR (Evercore), MS (Morgan Stanley), and NDAQ (Nasdaq) side by side to highlight how different business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles shape relative performance and market positioning. Traders seeking cyclical upside, steady compounding, or technology-driven recurring revenue will find each name represents a distinct strategic bet on capital markets. The analysis below focuses on recent quarters and observable developments rather than forward-looking predictions.
EVR Overview and Recent Performance
Evercore is a leading independent investment banking advisory firm, earning the bulk of its revenue from mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advice, restructuring, and capital markets underwriting, alongside a growing wealth management unit. In its most recent quarter, EVR reported record adjusted net revenues of roughly $1.05 billion, up about 42% year over year, with adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $3.48. Advisory fees climbed approximately 49% as deal activity rebounded, and assets under management (AUM) in its wealth segment reached a record. Despite the beat, shares pulled back in the following session, reflecting how heavily the stock is tied to ongoing deal-flow momentum and expense growth. Recent weeks have underscored both the firm's market-share gains and its sensitivity to the broader M&A cycle.
MS Overview and Recent Performance
Morgan Stanley is a diversified global financial institution spanning institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management. Its latest quarterly results showed record net revenues of $18.22 billion, up 18% year over year, with EPS of $2.80 and net income rising about 45%. Investment banking fees jumped roughly 44%, equity trading revenue climbed 35%, and wealth management generated record revenue of $8.2 billion. Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE), a key profitability measure, reached approximately 23.5%. The stock touched an all-time high following the results, and total client assets across wealth and investment management approached $8.9 trillion. Recent market activity has favored MS, reflecting broad strength across its integrated platform.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq has evolved from a traditional stock exchange into a diversified financial-technology and data company, with revenue from market services, indexes, capital access, and financial technology software. In its most recent quarter, NDAQ reported net revenue of about $1.3 billion, up 15% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $0.88. Annualized recurring revenue (ARR) crossed the $3 billion milestone, and Solutions revenue surpassed $1 billion for the first time. Financial Technology revenue grew about 23%, while index assets under management reached record levels above $800 billion. Recent weeks have highlighted Nasdaq's shift toward more predictable, subscription-like income, though its shares have shown more measured momentum than its banking peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, which collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and statistics, along with a defined set of tickers it monitors. Only the bots best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this curated section, helping traders filter a large universe down to the most relevant signals. Visitors can review metrics such as win rates, trade frequency, and historical returns to compare approaches before selecting one aligned with their objectives. To explore the most timely and adaptable strategies available today, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
These three companies occupy very different positions within financial services. EVR is a high-margin, human-capital-intensive advisory business whose earnings swing with the M&A and underwriting cycle; it offers strong operating leverage in upcycles but limited diversification and higher expense sensitivity. MS combines cyclical institutional banking with a steadier wealth and investment management engine, giving it a more balanced earnings profile and meaningful scale, though it carries greater balance-sheet and credit exposure. NDAQ is the most defensive of the three, with recurring subscription and index revenue that is less tied to any single deal or trading day, but it trades at a higher valuation relative to slower-growing, infrastructure-style earnings.
In terms of growth drivers, EVR is levered to a rebound in M&A and initial public offerings (IPOs); MS benefits from both deal activity and rising client assets; and NDAQ depends on software adoption, listings, and index flows. Risk factors likewise differ: EVR faces fee-timing and expense risk, MS faces market and credit cycles, and NDAQ faces competitive pressure from rival exchanges and slower structural growth. Sentiment in recent weeks has favored the diversified bank's momentum, while the other two names reflect steadier, more defensive positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings stability, and the breadth of positive catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor MS in the current environment. The stock's record results, all-time-high price action, and diversified revenue base combine strong momentum with comparatively balanced downside risk. That said, NDAQ offers the most stable recurring-revenue profile and may appeal to more defensive, trend-consistent strategies, while EVR presents the highest cyclical upside if advisory activity remains elevated. The relative ranking would depend on the specific AI strategy applied, and the conclusion is framed in probabilistic terms rather than as a definitive forecast.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
EVR in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on October 19, 2026
EVR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 28 of 37 cases where EVR's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where EVR's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.05% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EVR advanced for three days, in 247 of 342 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on EVR as a result. In 56 of 90 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for EVR turned negative on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 29 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 60%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EVR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Aroon Indicator for EVR entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 22 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. EVR’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 87 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.285) is normal, around the industry mean (3.532). P/E Ratio (13.288) is within average values for comparable stocks, (8.846). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.154) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.014) settles around the average of (7.708) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.339) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
MS's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MS turned positive on October 21, 2026. Looking at past instances where MS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 20 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 46 of 58 cases where MS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +4.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MS advanced for three days, in 231 of 356 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
MS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
The Aroon Indicator for MS entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 92 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.711) is normal, around the industry mean (3.532). P/E Ratio (14.718) is within average values for comparable stocks, (8.846). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.702) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.025) settles around the average of (7.708) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.380) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).
NDAQ in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026
NDAQ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 25 of 32 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NDAQ as a result. In 49 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NDAQ just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where NDAQ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The 10-day moving average for NDAQ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +8.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NDAQ advanced for three days, in 224 of 356 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NDAQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
NDAQ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NDAQ entered a downward trend on September 25, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. NDAQ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 89 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.782) is normal, around the industry mean (4.019). P/E Ratio (29.642) is within average values for comparable stocks, (17.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.712) is also within normal values, averaging (1.780). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.831) is also within normal values, averaging (7.166).
EVR | MS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 4 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 20 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 5 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 59 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 52 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EVR's Valuation (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (89) and is in the same range as MS (92). This means that EVR's stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s and similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.
MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (23) and is in the same range as EVR (50). This means that MS's stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s and similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.
MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (27) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (52). This means that MS's stock grew similarly to EVR’s and somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (59) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EVR (76). This means that NDAQ's stock grew similarly to MS’s and somewhat faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (52) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EVR (91). This means that NDAQ's stock grew similarly to MS’s and somewhat faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.
| EVR | MS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 60% | 10 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and NDAQ’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- EVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EVR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NDAQ’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EVR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.03% , and NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price fluctuated +10.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
EVR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2027.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.04% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+4.45% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
Advertisement
EVR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVR has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVR jumps, then MC could also see price increases.
MS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +7.47% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| SF - NDAQ | 66% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||