Apollo Global Management (APO), Blackstone (BX), and KKR & Co. (KKR) represent prominent players in the alternative asset management industry. These firms attract institutional and increasingly retail investors seeking diversified exposure beyond traditional equities and fixed income. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Professional traders and long-term investors focused on sector trends, fee income stability, and deal flow may find the analysis relevant for assessing allocation opportunities within the alternatives space.
Apollo Global Management (APO) operates as a global alternative asset manager with a diversified platform spanning private equity, credit, and insurance-related businesses. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited consolidation within its 52-week range following earlier volatility. Performance has been supported by ongoing fundraising efforts and capital deployment in credit and direct lending strategies. Recent developments include participation in large-scale financing arrangements and acquisitions aimed at expanding revenue streams. Sentiment has reflected a balance of positive deal momentum and broader market caution, contributing to steady but range-bound trading in recent weeks.
Blackstone (BX) is one of the largest alternative asset managers globally, with a broad footprint in private equity, real estate, credit, and infrastructure. The stock has traded in a contained range during recent market activity, supported by record levels of assets under management (AUM) and continued expansion in fee-earning assets. Key influences include realization activity generating performance fees and investments in emerging areas such as AI infrastructure. Market positioning reflects resilience in core businesses, with analysts noting stable operational trends amid fluctuating macroeconomic conditions.
KKR & Co. (KKR) focuses on private equity, credit, and strategic growth investments across multiple sectors. In recent weeks, the stock has shown recovery tendencies from earlier lows within its trading range, aided by new platform launches and takeover activity. Developments such as the introduction of specialized solutions in healthcare and participation in energy and infrastructure bids have contributed to sentiment. The firm maintains a constructive analyst outlook ahead of its upcoming quarterly results, with emphasis on realization momentum and capital return initiatives.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, but only the best and most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many demonstrating success rates in ranges such as 60-80% across different market environments and average trade durations from intraday to multi-week periods. All the AI trading bots have different trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Explore the full selection to identify bots aligned with individual risk parameters and objectives.
Apollo Global Management (APO), Blackstone (BX), and KKR & Co. (KKR) share core business models centered on alternative investments but differ in scale and emphasis. Blackstone (BX) leads in overall AUM scale, providing broader diversification across real assets, while Apollo Global Management (APO) maintains strength in credit and insurance integration. KKR & Co. (KKR) differentiates through targeted growth platforms and healthcare initiatives. Recent momentum varies, with each firm reporting distinct deal pipelines that influence short-term sentiment. Risk factors include sensitivity to interest rate changes and private market liquidity, though fee-based revenues offer relative stability. Sector exposure remains concentrated in alternatives, with valuation multiples reflecting growth expectations tempered by macroeconomic uncertainty. Market sentiment appears balanced, with no single firm dominating recent analyst revisions.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in fee-related metrics, stability of AUM growth, and near-term catalysts including realization activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to Blackstone (BX). This positioning reflects its scale advantages and diversified platform, though outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions and relative performance across the peer group.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and KKR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and KKR’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.78% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.43% , and KKR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -1.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.
APO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
BX is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | BX | KKR | |
| Capitalization | 70.7B | 104B | 89.2B |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | N/A | 9.89B |
| Gain YTD | -14.597 | -13.890 | -21.763 |
| P/E Ratio | 77.11 | 29.08 | 33.80 |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 12.6B | 20.4B |
| Total Cash | 253B | N/A | 132B |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 14.2B | 54.6B |
APO | BX | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 35 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 69 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 29 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 58 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 88 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BX's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for APO (80) and is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (81). This means that BX's stock grew significantly faster than APO’s and significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (69) and is in the same range as KKR (71). This means that APO's stock grew similarly to BX’s and similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
BX's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (70) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APO (92). This means that BX's stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s and somewhat faster than APO’s over the last 12 months.
BX's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (61) and is in the same range as APO (71). This means that BX's stock grew similarly to KKR’s and similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BX (88) and is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (93). This means that APO's stock grew significantly faster than BX’s and significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | BX | KKR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.