Advertisement
ARES or BAM or BX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management (ARES) vs. Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. Blackstone (BX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ARES reported strong second-quarter 2026 results with record fundraising and growth in fee-related earnings, driving recent outperformance relative to peers.
- BAM delivered solid first-quarter fundraising of $21 billion and year-over-year growth in fee-related earnings, though its year-to-date stock return trailed the other two names.
- BX maintained steady positioning with modest recent gains and continued focus on credit and infrastructure opportunities amid broader sector consolidation.
- All three firms operate in the alternative asset management sector, with assets under management (AUM) expansion serving as a primary growth driver across the group.
- Valuation sensitivity remains elevated for the sector, with ARES showing the strongest recent momentum while BAM and BX trade at comparatively lower multiples.
- Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism tied to private credit demand and macroeconomic stability, with limited divergence in recent weeks’ price action.
Introduction
Alternative asset managers ARES, BAM, and BX represent leading players in private equity, credit, and infrastructure investing. This comparison examines their recent stock performance, business fundamentals, and market positioning to assist institutional and sophisticated retail investors evaluating exposure within the asset management sector. The analysis draws on verifiable developments from recent market activity to highlight relative strengths without forward-looking speculation.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) specializes in private credit, private equity, and real assets, with assets under management (AUM) reaching $671 billion as of June 30, 2026. In recent weeks, the stock advanced following second-quarter 2026 earnings that exceeded revenue expectations at $1.43 billion and featured record fundraising alongside higher fee-related earnings. The share price closed at $128.09 on July 31, 2026, reflecting a year-to-date return of approximately 18.86 percent and one-year return near 28.41 percent. Positive sentiment stemmed from private credit origination strength and sequential AUM growth, though the stock remains below its 52-week high of $195.26.
BAM Overview and Recent Performance
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) manages a diversified portfolio spanning infrastructure, renewable power, private equity, and real estate, with a focus on long-duration capital. Recent market activity showed steady but more modest gains, with the stock closing at $48.40 on July 31, 2026. Year-to-date performance stood at 6.24 percent, while the one-year return reached 18.61 percent. First-quarter 2026 results highlighted $21 billion in fundraising and an 18 percent year-over-year increase in fee-related earnings. The shares traded within a 52-week range of $42.20 to $64.10, indicating contained volatility relative to broader sector moves.
BX Overview and Recent Performance
Blackstone Inc. (BX) is a global leader in alternative asset management with emphasis on private equity, real estate, credit, and infrastructure strategies. In recent weeks, the stock exhibited consolidation with modest gains, closing near $127.75–$128 on July 31, 2026. Year-to-date return approximated 15.38 percent and one-year performance reached 23.46 percent. The company continues to benefit from credit expansion and AI-related infrastructure opportunities, though shares remain well below the 52-week high of $190.09 within a range of $101.73 to $190.09. Market positioning reflects balanced exposure across asset classes amid sector-wide repricing.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots suited to prevailing market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends, consistent statistics, and suitable risk profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with many achieving win rates between 55 percent and 75 percent or higher depending on the specific model and market environment. Traders can explore detailed backtested results, live performance data, and ticker-specific suitability directly on the platform. For the latest selections, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three firms share exposure to the alternative asset management sector but differ in scale, strategy emphasis, and recent momentum. ARES stands out for its private credit focus and stronger recent earnings-driven gains, while BAM offers broader infrastructure and renewable exposure with more measured stock appreciation. BX provides the largest market capitalization and diversified credit-real estate mix, delivering intermediate returns. Risk factors include sensitivity to interest rates and fundraising cycles for all three, with ARES displaying higher beta historically. Valuation multiples appear more compressed for BAM and BX relative to ARES, creating potential trade-offs between growth visibility and entry pricing. Sector sentiment remains supported by sustained demand for private credit but tempered by macroeconomic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings momentum, AUM growth consistency, and relative price stability, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to ARES among the three. Its stronger year-to-date and recent period performance, coupled with private credit catalysts, positions it favorably within the group, though outcomes remain contingent on continued sector tailwinds and individual risk tolerance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and BX’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- ARES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and BX’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.84% price change this week, while BAM (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.45% , and BX (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +8.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +5.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
BX is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+5.92% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | BAM | BX | |
| Capitalization | 30.9B | 83.4B | 110B |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 3.46B | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -12.478 | 3.609 | -10.703 |
| P/E Ratio | 62.78 | 29.99 | 30.68 |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 4.77B | 12.6B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.1B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 3.83B | 14.2B |
ARES | BAM | BX | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 38 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 91 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 32 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 47 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 82 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BX's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (15) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (69) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BX's stock grew similarly to BAM’s and somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BX (66) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (91) in the null industry. This means that ARES's stock grew similarly to BX’s and somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.
BX's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (32) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ARES (97) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BX's stock grew similarly to BAM’s and significantly faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ARES (47) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as BX (48) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM's stock grew similarly to ARES’s and similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as BX (85) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as ARES (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM's stock grew similarly to BX’s and similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | BAM | BX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 17 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
ARES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 83% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| BX - ARES | 79% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| APO - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
BAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
BX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.