Advertisement
ARES or BN or STT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs. State Street Corporation (STT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ARES boasts $622 billion in AUM (assets under management) with robust Q1 fundraising, but trades at a high trailing P/E of 74 amid YTD gains of 21%.
- BN leads with $105 billion market cap and $614 billion fee-bearing capital, showing steady 23% 1-year returns driven by nuclear and infrastructure ventures.
- STT delivers the strongest 1-year performance at 63% and attractive P/E of 15, bolstered by $5.7 trillion AUM and tokenized asset innovations.
- All three asset managers reported strong Q1 results, with STT EPS beating estimates at $2.84 and ARES highlighting record direct lending originations.
- Recent momentum favors STT and ARES YTD, while BN offers diversification across real assets.
- Dividend yields range from BN's 0.59% to ARES's 4.28%, appealing to income-focused investors.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ARES, BN, and STT, three prominent players in asset management navigating a landscape of rising interest rates, alternative investments, and digital asset innovation. All operate in financial services, managing vast AUM for institutional and high-net-worth clients. Traders seeking momentum in credit and private markets may eye ARES and BN, while long-term investors value STT's custody scale. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in growth drivers, valuations, and sector exposure, aiding decisions on relative performance and positioning.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
ARES, or Ares Management Corporation, is a leading alternative asset manager with $622 billion in total AUM, including $385 billion fee-earning AUM as of late 2025. Focused on credit, private equity, real estate, and infrastructure, it serves institutional investors globally through 35+ offices. In recent weeks, shares around $126 have rebounded over 18% monthly amid broader financial sector gains, though down from a 52-week high of $195. Q1 2026 results showed fee-related earnings growth, record U.S. direct lending originations of $9.5 billion, and fundraising momentum targeting 16-20% CAGR. Sentiment benefits from private credit demand and acquisitions like a Rover Pipeline stake, offsetting YTD volatility.
BN Overview and Recent Performance
BN, Brookfield Corporation, is a global alternative asset manager emphasizing real estate, renewables, infrastructure, and private equity, with fee-bearing capital reaching $614 billion. Its diversified model spans asset management and operating businesses. Shares trading near $47 have gained about 11% in recent weeks, up 23% over the past year within a 52-week range of $38-$50. Momentum stems from strategic moves like a nuclear JV with The Nuclear Company for Westinghouse tech and robust Q1 fundraising of $21 billion. Profit rose 7% amid AI infrastructure and settlements, supporting steady performance despite modest YTD gains.
STT Overview and Recent Performance
STT, State Street Corporation, provides custody, investment management, and research services with $5.7 trillion AUM and $54 trillion under custody/administration. It caters to institutional investors via ETFs, analytics, and blockchain solutions. Shares at $149 have shown resilience, up 63% over the past year and 17% YTD, despite short-term dips from a 52-week high of $156. Recent market activity reflects Q1 revenue of $3.8 billion (up 16% YoY) and EPS of $2.84 beating estimates, fueled by fee income and innovations like tokenized funds with Galaxy Digital. Sentiment shifts positively on ETF growth and Luxembourg expansion.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. AI analyzes all bots to spotlight those excelling in current volatility, showcasing 25 trending ones out of 351 total. Standouts include bots with annualized returns up to 285% (e.g., Space Infrastructure), win rates of 70-80%, and profit factors of 2.5-3.0+, like Semiconductor strategies at 72-96% returns or Finance bots at 42% with 83% win rates. These vary from swing trading to pattern recognition, often targeting high-momentum areas like semis (NVDA, AVGO) and industrials. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to today’s market conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ARES and BN emphasize alternatives like private credit and infrastructure, contrasting STT's custody and ETF focus. Growth drivers differ: ARES leverages $622B AUM for credit originations, BN $614B fee capital via real assets, and STT $5.7T AUM through digital servicing. Recent momentum peaks at STT (63% 1-year), with ARES volatile (21% 1-year). Risk factors include rate sensitivity for ARES/BN (high P/E 74/96) vs. STT's stability (P/E 15). Valuations show STT cheapest on earnings, while BN's scale offers diversification trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors STT due to superior trend consistency, with 63% 1-year returns, stable Q1 beats, and catalysts in tokenized assets amid ETF inflows. Its lower P/E and balanced exposure position it probabilistically stronger relative to ARES's volatility and BN's slower YTD momentum, though all benefit from asset management tailwinds.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and STT’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
- ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and STT’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- STT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.52% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.79% , and STT (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-3.66% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | BN | STT | |
| Capitalization | 25.7B | 106B | 46.7B |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 33.1B | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -23.493 | -3.929 | 36.452 |
| P/E Ratio | 58.02 | 86.53 | 17.64 |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 75.7B | 14.5B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 4.43B |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 264B | 29.2B |
ARES | BN | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 66 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 34 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 89 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 52 | 10 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 95 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STT (68) in the Regional Banks industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ARES's stock grew somewhat faster than STT’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BN (34) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew similarly to BN’s and somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
STT's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (89) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ARES (96) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew significantly faster than BN’s and significantly faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (52) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (57) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s and somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
STT's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARES (88) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (95) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew significantly faster than ARES’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | BN | STT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
ARES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | -4.07% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 82% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| BX - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| APO - ARES | 76% Closely correlated | -3.40% | ||
More | ||||
BN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
STT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.