Advertisement
CRWD or HUBS or ZS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike (CRWD) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Zscaler (ZS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CrowdStrike (CRWD) has delivered the strongest recent momentum among the three, with year-to-date returns exceeding 55% amid AI-driven cybersecurity demand and multiple analyst price target increases.
- HubSpot (HUBS) reported solid quarterly revenue growth of approximately 23% but continues to face longer-term share price pressure, with year-to-date declines near 45%.
- Zscaler (ZS) experienced sharp volatility, including a roughly 31% single-day drop on cautious forward guidance, resulting in year-to-date returns around -38% despite revenue beats.
- All three companies operate in high-growth technology sectors—cybersecurity for CRWD and ZS, customer relationship management software for HUBS—with varying exposure to artificial intelligence adoption.
- Relative performance highlights contrasts in stability, with CRWD showing greater consistency in recent market activity compared to the sharper swings in ZS and the sustained declines in HUBS.
- Market sentiment remains tied to broader technology spending trends, earnings visibility, and AI integration across their respective platforms.
Introduction
This comparison examines CrowdStrike (CRWD), HubSpot (HUBS), and Zscaler (ZS) to provide traders and investors with an objective view of their relative positioning in the current market. These stocks represent distinct yet interconnected areas within the technology sector: endpoint and cloud security for the cybersecurity names and inbound marketing and sales platform solutions for the customer experience software provider. The analysis focuses on recent performance trends, business drivers, and observable market factors that may influence short- to medium-term trading decisions. Institutional and retail participants monitoring growth-oriented equities, sector rotations within technology, or AI-related themes may find the side-by-side evaluation useful for assessing relative opportunities and risks.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) provides cloud-native cybersecurity solutions centered on its Falcon platform, serving enterprise clients with endpoint protection, threat intelligence, and identity management. In recent weeks, the stock has shown robust upward movement, closing at $731.00 on May 29 with an 8.94% single-day gain and extending a rally supported by AI security initiatives and expanded partnerships. Year-to-date returns stand near 56%, significantly outpacing the broader market. Key influences include raised analyst price targets ahead of upcoming quarterly results, recognition in industry reports for endpoint protection leadership, and positive momentum from projects integrating advanced security features. Sentiment has remained constructive amid sustained demand for cybersecurity spending and AI enhancements.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) offers a customer relationship management platform that integrates marketing, sales, and service tools, primarily serving small to mid-sized businesses and scaling enterprises. Recent market activity featured a notable 10.98% gain on May 29, closing at $220.63, following quarterly results that highlighted approximately 23% year-over-year revenue growth and AI-related product developments. However, broader performance shows year-to-date declines of about 45%. Factors affecting sentiment include positive earnings beats alongside concerns over longer sales cycles potentially influenced by artificial intelligence tools. The company has pursued strategic integrations and maintained focus on platform enhancements, contributing to mixed but observable trading patterns in recent periods.
ZS Overview and Recent Performance
Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) delivers cloud security solutions emphasizing zero-trust architecture and secure access service edge for enterprise networks. The stock has displayed elevated volatility in recent weeks, including a significant decline of approximately 31% on one trading day following earnings that beat revenue expectations but featured cautious forward guidance. Year-to-date returns approximate -38%. Influences on performance include leadership adjustments, competitive dynamics in cloud security, and broader questions around AI-driven alternatives. Recovery attempts have occurred amid ongoing revenue expansion near 25% in the latest reported period, though overall sentiment reflects sensitivity to outlook details and sector positioning.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across its platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability, consistency, and alignment with current trends are featured in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and trading styles. The platform provides transparent statistics on historical results for each bot. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed listings and performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CrowdStrike (CRWD), HubSpot (HUBS), and Zscaler (ZS) differ markedly in business models: CRWD and ZS focus on cybersecurity infrastructure with recurring subscription revenue tied to threat protection and compliance, while HUBS centers on software-as-a-service tools that drive customer acquisition and retention efficiencies. Growth drivers for the cybersecurity pair include rising enterprise spending on AI-enhanced defenses, whereas HUBS benefits from digital transformation in marketing automation. Recent momentum favors CRWD with steadier gains, contrasted by HUBS’s longer-term price erosion and ZS’s pronounced volatility around guidance. Risk factors encompass valuation sensitivity to growth expectations for all three, with ZS showing higher drawdown exposure. Sector exposure places CRWD and ZS in defensive technology amid cyber threats, while HUBS aligns more with cyclical software demand. Market sentiment reflects stronger near-term catalysts for CRWD relative to the others.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, recent stability, and positive catalysts including analyst upgrades and AI integration momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CrowdStrike (CRWD) among the three. HubSpot (HUBS) and Zscaler (ZS) exhibit greater variability in performance and outlook sensitivity that may warrant continued monitoring. This assessment draws from relative positioning in recent market activity rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and ZS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- ZS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.23% , and ZS (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated -0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-2.46% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-3.44% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | HUBS | ZS | |
| Capitalization | 173B | 8.87B | 20.4B |
| EBITDA | 329M | 267M | 144M |
| Gain YTD | 45.260 | -56.818 | -43.905 |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 90.95 | N/A |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 3.3B | 3.17B |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 1.69B | 3.54B |
| Total Debt | 821M | 247M | 1.86B |
CRWD | HUBS | ZS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 56 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 89 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZS's Valuation (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that ZS's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s and significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (92) in the null industry, and is in the same range as ZS (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (89) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s and somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | HUBS | ZS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 23 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A | 1 day ago 61% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 67% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| HUBS - CRWD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
More | ||||
ZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.