This comparison examines Autodesk (ADSK), Freshworks (FRSH), and Atlassian (TEAM), three publicly traded companies in the enterprise software sector. The analysis focuses on their business models, recent price behavior, and relative positioning amid evolving market conditions. Professional investors and traders evaluating software stocks for portfolio allocation or tactical opportunities may find this overview relevant, as it highlights observable differences in performance trends and sector dynamics without forward-looking projections.
Autodesk (ADSK) develops design, engineering, and entertainment software solutions used across industries including architecture, manufacturing, and media. In recent market activity, the stock has traded in a consolidation range near the $240 level following earlier volatility. Performance in recent weeks has reflected broader pressures on high-valuation software names, with the share price remaining below its 52-week high and showing limited upside momentum relative to broader indices. Sentiment has been influenced by ongoing subscription growth in core products and cautious investor positioning toward the sector.
Freshworks (FRSH) provides cloud-based customer engagement and IT service management platforms aimed at small to midsize businesses. Recent market activity has seen the stock post gains, with year-to-date returns exceeding 25% as of late May 2026. The share price has fluctuated within a range bounded by its 52-week low and high, supported by steady adoption of its SaaS offerings. Investor sentiment appears tied to execution on revenue expansion and operational efficiency in a competitive customer relationship management landscape.
Atlassian (TEAM) delivers collaboration, project management, and development tools including Jira and Confluence to enterprises worldwide. Recent market activity featured a sharp upward move following the company’s fiscal third-quarter results in early May, with the stock rising approximately 30% on strong cloud and data center revenue figures. Year-to-date performance has remained positive and ahead of many peers. Sentiment has been shaped by demonstrated resilience in subscription metrics and continued investment in platform enhancements.
Trending AI Robots showcases a curated selection from Tickeron’s extensive library of hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn inclusion in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many reporting win rates in the 60-80% range alongside varying risk metrics depending on the specific strategy. All bots maintain distinct approaches to ticker selection and position management. For additional details on these tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Business models differ in focus: Autodesk (ADSK) emphasizes creative and technical design tools with high switching costs, Freshworks (FRSH) targets customer-facing operations through modular SaaS applications, and Atlassian (TEAM) centers on team collaboration and agile workflows. Growth drivers include recurring revenue expansion for all three, though recent momentum has favored TEAM following its earnings catalyst while ADSK has faced relative headwinds and FRSH has recorded steadier advances. Risk factors encompass sector-wide valuation compression, competitive pressures in software, and sensitivity to enterprise spending cycles. Sector exposure remains concentrated in technology, with varying degrees of exposure to cloud migration trends. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with TEAM showing clearer recent outperformance and the others exhibiting more measured responses to broader conditions.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency following recent earnings, relative stability, and positioning within the software sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Atlassian (TEAM). This assessment draws from its demonstrated post-earnings momentum and year-to-date outperformance compared with the steadier but less pronounced advances in Freshworks (FRSH) and the consolidation phase observed in Autodesk (ADSK). Such evaluations remain probabilistic and subject to ongoing market developments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TEAM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TEAM’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.01% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.91% , and TEAM (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -12.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.29%.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ADSK | FRSH | TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 43.4B | 2.55B | 22.6B |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 42.9M | -21.17M |
| Gain YTD | -30.553 | -24.776 | -44.986 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.01 | 15.00 | N/A |
| Revenue | 7.51B | 871M | 6.19B |
| Total Cash | 2.92B | 779M | 1.14B |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | 38.8M | 1.24B |
ADSK | FRSH | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 81 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 51 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 57 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 28 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 28 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ADSK (76) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to ADSK’s and somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ADSK (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to ADSK’s and similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (51) in the Restaurants industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADSK's stock grew similarly to FRSH’s and significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TEAM (61) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as ADSK (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to TEAM’s and similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (28) in the Restaurants industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ADSK (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM's stock grew similarly to FRSH’s and significantly faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | FRSH | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 4 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NTSE | 47.90 | 2.11 | +4.60% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF | |||
| FAS | 139.11 | 2.98 | +2.19% |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | |||
| METD | 17.54 | 0.06 | +0.34% |
| Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | |||
| EFT | 10.78 | 0.01 | +0.09% |
| Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | |||
| VYLD | 28.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Inverse Vix Short-Term Futures Etns Due March 22, 2045 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK | 100% | -7.10% | ||
| CLSK - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +8.39% | ||
| CRWD - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +6.76% | ||
| CRM - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| PANW - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| COIN - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | -1.86% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 70% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| ASAN - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| SPT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -5.05% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| FRSH - TEAM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||