Advertisement
FRSH or HUBS or TTAN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) vs. HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs. ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FRSH, HUBS, and TTAN operate in the software-as-a-service (SaaS) space, with exposure to customer experience, CRM, and field service management platforms respectively.
- Recent market activity has shown varied price responses, with HUBS and TTAN exhibiting notable single-session gains amid broader technology sector movements.
- FRSH focuses on AI-enhanced customer and employee experience tools, while HUBS emphasizes integrated marketing, sales, and service hubs, and TTAN targets end-to-end cloud software for contractors.
- Valuation sensitivity differs across the trio, influenced by growth trajectories in artificial intelligence integration and sector-specific demand.
- Market sentiment reflects ongoing interest in SaaS platforms leveraging AI for operational efficiency, with relative performance shaped by earnings visibility and competitive positioning.
- Comparative risk factors include execution on product roadmaps and macroeconomic impacts on technology spending.
Introduction
This comparison examines three publicly traded SaaS companies—Freshworks Inc. (FRSH), HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS), and ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN)—to highlight differences in business models, recent price behavior, and market positioning. The analysis targets traders and investors seeking to understand relative performance within the technology sector, particularly those evaluating software platforms amid evolving AI adoption and enterprise spending patterns. It draws on observable market data and sector trends to provide a balanced view suitable for both experienced market participants and those building foundational knowledge of equity comparisons.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks Inc. develops cloud-based software-as-a-service solutions focused on customer experience and employee experience platforms. Its offerings include AI-powered tools for customer service, sales CRM, marketing automation, and IT service management. In recent weeks, FRSH has traded within a relatively stable range, reflecting measured investor response to ongoing product enhancements and competitive dynamics in the customer service software space. Sentiment has been influenced by broader technology sector rotations and company-specific updates on AI feature integration, contributing to contained price movements compared to more volatile peers.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. provides a comprehensive cloud-based customer relationship management platform encompassing marketing, sales, service, operations, and content management tools. The company has emphasized AI capabilities such as content generation and automation features. Recent market activity has included periods of elevated trading volume, with HUBS demonstrating responsiveness to positive signals around AI-driven growth and revenue expansion. Performance in recent weeks has been shaped by sector-wide interest in scalable CRM solutions and the company’s positioning within mid-market business-to-business segments.
TTAN Overview and Recent Performance
ServiceTitan, Inc. delivers an end-to-end cloud-based software platform designed for contractors, supporting operations in the United States, Armenia, and Canada. Its technology addresses business management needs for service-based industries. In recent market sessions, TTAN has recorded notable price fluctuations, including periods of upward movement tied to earnings visibility and sector interest in vertical SaaS applications. Sentiment has been affected by the company’s growth profile within the field service management niche and broader technology market conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots through its Trending AI Robots page, where hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers are evaluated for suitability under prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with current trends, robust statistics, and effective strategies earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options tailored to individual preferences. Factual ranges include varying win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles across the platform’s offerings. For additional details on these tools, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three companies differ in core focus: FRSH centers on omnichannel customer and employee engagement tools, HUBS integrates a full-suite CRM with marketing and sales automation, and TTAN specializes in vertical software for contractor operations. Growth drivers include AI enhancements across all, though HUBS and TTAN have shown more pronounced recent price sensitivity to positive catalysts. Risk factors encompass execution on AI roadmaps and exposure to enterprise technology budgets, with FRSH displaying comparatively steadier behavior. Sector exposure remains technology-oriented, while valuation metrics reflect differences in scale and profitability trajectories. Market sentiment favors platforms with clear AI differentiation, creating trade-offs in momentum versus stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, relative stability, and positioning around AI integration, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to HUBS among the three, owing to its demonstrated responsiveness to sector catalysts and established platform breadth. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing data patterns rather than guarantees of future outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TTAN’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTAN’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- TTAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.60% , and TTAN (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -13.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
TTAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.21% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FRSH | HUBS | TTAN | |
| Capitalization | 2.61B | 9.62B | 6.37B |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | 267M | -44.69M |
| Gain YTD | -22.898 | -53.157 | -37.305 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.37 | 98.94 | N/A |
| Revenue | 871M | 3.3B | 1.01B |
| Total Cash | 779M | 1.69B | 422M |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 247M | 51M |
FRSH | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as HUBS (65) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | HUBS | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 69% | 15 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | N/A | 4 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XNTK | 369.05 | 2.53 | +0.69% |
| State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF | |||
| CBLS | 32.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Clough Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| LVLN | 24.61 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Leveraged Ln ETF | |||
| NBH | 10.39 | -0.06 | -0.57% |
| Neuberger Municipal Fund Inc. | |||
| AIBD | 5.39 | -0.12 | -2.18% |
| Direxion Daily AI And Big Data Bear 2X | |||
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ASAN - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SPT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
More | ||||
TTAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| GWRE - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| FRSH - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| NOW - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||